**

EU's Green Deal Under Fire: Legal and Economic Experts Warn of Sustainability Rollback

The European Union's ambitious Green Deal, a flagship initiative aimed at achieving climate neutrality by 2050, is facing significant headwinds. A growing chorus of legal and economic experts are sounding the alarm over a perceived rollback of key sustainability rules, raising concerns about the EU's commitment to environmental protection and its potential impact on the global climate effort. This retreat, they argue, not only jeopardizes the EU's own climate targets but also undermines its international leadership role in tackling the climate crisis. Keywords like EU Green Deal, ESG regulations, sustainability standards, climate neutrality, and environmental regulations are central to understanding the unfolding situation.

Weakening of Environmental Regulations: A Step Backwards?

Critics point to several instances where the EU appears to be diluting or delaying the implementation of crucial environmental regulations. This includes:

• Relaxation of targets for renewable energy: Some member states are lobbying for less ambitious targets for renewable energy sources, slowing the transition away from fossil fuels. This challenges the core principle of the European Climate Law and its commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

• Delays in implementing the EU Taxonomy: The EU Taxonomy, a crucial system for classifying sustainable economic activities, is facing delays and challenges in its implementation. This uncertainty makes it difficult for businesses to plan for and invest in sustainable projects, hindering the green transition. The EU Taxonomy Regulation and its impact on sustainable finance are key areas of debate.

• Compromises on deforestation-related regulations: Proposed regulations aimed at preventing deforestation linked to imported products are facing significant opposition, potentially weakening efforts to protect forests and biodiversity. This highlights the ongoing tension between environmental protection and economic interests.

• Challenges to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): The CBAM, designed to prevent "carbon leakage" by imposing tariffs on carbon-intensive imports, is facing legal and political hurdles, potentially delaying its implementation and reducing its effectiveness. Understanding the implications of carbon pricing and international trade is crucial here.

Economic Implications: Short-Term Gains, Long-Term Losses?

While some argue that these rollbacks are necessary to mitigate the economic impact of the Green Deal on businesses and consumers, economists warn of potentially significant long-term costs. The short-term economic benefits of delaying or weakening environmental regulations, they argue, are likely to be outweighed by the long-term consequences of climate change and environmental degradation.

• Increased climate-related risks: Delaying climate action increases the likelihood of more frequent and severe extreme weather events, leading to increased economic losses from damage to infrastructure, disruptions to supply chains, and losses in agricultural productivity.

• Stranded assets: Investments in fossil fuel infrastructure could become "stranded assets" if the transition to a low-carbon economy accelerates faster than anticipated. This poses a significant financial risk for investors and businesses.

• Reduced competitiveness: If the EU lags behind other regions in implementing ambitious climate policies, it could lose its competitive edge in the burgeoning green technology market. This underscores the importance of green technology investments and the circular economy.

Legal Challenges: Are the Rollbacks Legally Sound?

The legal framework underpinning the Green Deal and its various regulations is complex and extensive. Legal experts are questioning the legality of some of the proposed rollbacks, raising concerns about compliance with existing EU law and international agreements.

• Violation of the Paris Agreement: Weakening climate commitments could be seen as a violation of the Paris Agreement, putting the EU at risk of international legal challenges and reputational damage.

• Challenges from NGOs and civil society: Environmental NGOs and civil society groups are already preparing legal challenges against decisions that they believe are undermining the EU's climate and environmental goals. The role of environmental litigation and the rights of future generations is becoming increasingly important.

• Conflicts with EU law: Some argue that the proposed rollbacks conflict with existing EU environmental legislation, potentially leading to legal challenges and delays.

The Way Forward: Recommitting to Ambitious Climate Action

The perceived rollback of sustainability rules within the EU raises serious concerns about the bloc's commitment to its own climate targets and its leadership role in global climate action. The focus must shift towards finding a sustainable balance between economic growth and environmental protection. This requires:

• Strengthening the enforcement of existing regulations: Ensuring that existing environmental laws are rigorously enforced is crucial to avoiding further delays and weakening of the Green Deal.

• Investing in green technologies and innovation: Investing heavily in green technologies can create new economic opportunities while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

• Promoting a just transition: The transition to a low-carbon economy must be managed fairly, ensuring that workers and communities affected by the shift receive appropriate support.

• Reinforcing international cooperation: The EU needs to maintain its leadership in international climate negotiations and work with other countries to accelerate the global transition to a sustainable future.

The EU's Green Deal is a landmark initiative crucial not only for Europe's future but also for the global effort to combat climate change. Any weakening of its core principles risks undermining the EU’s long-term economic prosperity and its credibility on the international stage. A robust, transparent, and legally sound approach is vital to ensure the Green Deal remains a powerful force in achieving climate neutrality and sustainable development.