**

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has recently taken a significant step towards bolstering the Public Wi-Fi Network Interface (PM-WANI) scheme by prescribing a cap on the tariffs charged to Public Data Offices (PDOs) by Access Providers (APs). This move is expected to significantly impact the accessibility and affordability of public Wi-Fi in India, potentially accelerating the growth of the scheme and boosting digital inclusion. This development has sparked considerable debate amongst stakeholders, raising crucial questions about the scheme's future and its effectiveness in achieving its ambitious goals. Let's delve deeper into the specifics of TRAI's intervention and its implications.

TRAI's Tariff Cap: A Crucial Intervention for PM-WANI

The PM-WANI scheme, launched with the aim of providing affordable and easily accessible public Wi-Fi hotspots across India, has been facing challenges in its rollout. One of the major hurdles has been the pricing structure between Access Providers (APs) – those who own and operate the Wi-Fi infrastructure – and Public Data Offices (PDOs) – the entities that set up and manage public Wi-Fi hotspots using the AP's infrastructure. High tariffs charged by APs to PDOs have hampered the growth of the scheme, making it difficult for PDOs to offer competitively priced internet services to end-users.

TRAI's intervention addresses this directly by prescribing a maximum tariff that APs can charge PDOs. This move aims to level the playing field, encourage wider participation from PDOs, and ultimately make public Wi-Fi more affordable and readily available for citizens. The capped tariff is designed to ensure a sustainable and commercially viable model for both APs and PDOs, promoting healthy competition and preventing exploitative pricing practices.

Understanding the PM-WANI Ecosystem and the Tariff Implications

The PM-WANI ecosystem involves several key players:

• Department of Telecommunications (DoT): The governing body overseeing the implementation of the scheme.
• Access Providers (APs): Companies providing the underlying broadband infrastructure. Examples include large telecom operators, internet service providers (ISPs), and other infrastructure providers.
• Public Data Offices (PDOs): Businesses or individuals setting up and managing public Wi-Fi hotspots. These could include cafes, shops, libraries, and community centers.
• Data Consumers: The end-users who access the public Wi-Fi services.

The newly implemented tariff cap directly impacts the relationship between APs and PDOs. Before the cap, APs enjoyed significant pricing power, potentially leading to unsustainable costs for PDOs and ultimately higher prices for consumers. The cap introduces a degree of price regulation, aiming to make the scheme more attractive to PDOs and foster a more competitive market.

Impact of the Tariff Cap on Public Wi-Fi Accessibility and Affordability

The primary goal of the TRAI-mandated tariff cap is to improve the accessibility and affordability of public Wi-Fi services in India. By reducing the cost burden on PDOs, the regulation is expected to:

• Increase the number of public Wi-Fi hotspots: A lower cost of access will incentivize more PDOs to set up Wi-Fi hotspots, leading to broader coverage and accessibility.
• Lower prices for consumers: Reduced costs for PDOs should translate into more competitive pricing for consumers, making public Wi-Fi a more attractive alternative to mobile data.
• Boost digital inclusion: Affordable and accessible public Wi-Fi can play a crucial role in bridging the digital divide, connecting underserved communities and empowering citizens with digital literacy.

Challenges and Concerns Related to the Implementation of the Tariff Cap

While the tariff cap presents several benefits, it also brings certain challenges and concerns:

• Impact on APs' profitability: The capped tariffs might affect the profitability of APs, particularly those with higher infrastructure costs. This could lead to reduced investment in infrastructure expansion and maintenance.
• Potential for regulatory arbitrage: APs might seek ways to circumvent the tariff cap, leading to regulatory complexities and potential loopholes.
• Ensuring compliance and enforcement: Effective monitoring and enforcement mechanisms are crucial to ensure that the tariff cap is implemented fairly and effectively.

The Future of PM-WANI and the Role of Public Wi-Fi in India's Digital Transformation

TRAI's decision to cap PDO tariffs is a significant development with the potential to reshape the landscape of public Wi-Fi in India. The success of this intervention will depend on several factors, including the effectiveness of implementation, the level of participation from both APs and PDOs, and the overall demand for public Wi-Fi services. The scheme’s effectiveness will be closely monitored, particularly concerning its impact on affordability, accessibility and overall digital inclusion goals within the country. Further developments and revisions may be needed based on the outcome of the implemented tariff cap.

The broader context is India’s ambitious digital transformation goals. Public Wi-Fi plays a crucial role in achieving these goals by connecting citizens, businesses, and government services. The success of the PM-WANI scheme is, therefore, crucial for India's continued progress towards a digitally empowered society. The TRAI’s decision marks a pivotal moment, and its long-term impact will be closely observed by industry experts, policymakers, and citizens alike. The coming months and years will be critical in determining whether this regulation truly unleashes the potential of PM-WANI and delivers on its promise of widespread, affordable public Wi-Fi access across India.