**

Avant Money recently launched its new Flex Mortgage, a product designed to offer greater flexibility to borrowers. However, the announcement has sparked debate, with concerns raised about whether this innovative product represents a return to the risky lending practices that characterized Ireland's Celtic Tiger era. This Q&A aims to dissect the features of the Flex Mortgage, examine the potential risks, and determine whether it truly signals a resurgence of irresponsible lending or a genuine evolution in the Irish mortgage market.

Understanding Avant Money's Flex Mortgage

Avant Money's Flex Mortgage is marketed as a highly flexible option for homeowners, offering features that stand out from traditional mortgage products. These features include:

• Increased borrowing capacity: Borrowers may be able to borrow a larger sum than with traditional mortgages, potentially opening doors to more expensive properties.
• Variable interest rates: Interest rates fluctuate based on market conditions, offering potential savings during periods of low interest but exposing borrowers to increased costs during periods of high interest.
• Ability to overpay and underpay: Borrowers have the flexibility to overpay their mortgage during periods of financial surplus and underpay when finances are tight. This can provide financial breathing room but could also lead to longer repayment terms.
• Potential for increased equity release: This feature allows homeowners to access more equity in their property.

What Makes the Flex Mortgage Different?

The key differentiator of the Avant Money Flex Mortgage lies in its flexibility. Unlike traditional mortgages with fixed terms and repayment schedules, this product offers more dynamism, allowing borrowers to adjust their payments and borrowing amounts based on their changing financial circumstances. This increased flexibility is marketed as a major benefit for those who anticipate fluctuating income or unexpected expenses. However, this very flexibility also raises concerns among some financial analysts.

The Celtic Tiger Comparison: Is it Valid?

The comparison to the Celtic Tiger era is unavoidable. The Celtic Tiger period (roughly the late 1990s to mid-2000s) saw a boom in property prices fueled by readily available, often overly generous, mortgages. This led to a dramatic rise in house prices, followed by a spectacular crash and a devastating banking crisis.

The concern is that the increased borrowing capacity and flexibility offered by Avant Money's Flex Mortgage could, inadvertently, contribute to another unsustainable property market bubble. Could this lead to another round of risky lending that might destabilize the Irish economy?

Key Differences from Celtic Tiger Lending

It's crucial to highlight the differences between Avant Money's offering and the lending practices of the Celtic Tiger era:

• Stricter lending criteria: While the Flex Mortgage offers flexibility, it’s unlikely to be offered to borrowers with poor credit scores or inadequate income verification. Current regulations aim to prevent the irresponsible lending seen during the Celtic Tiger era.
• Increased regulatory oversight: The Central Bank of Ireland's regulatory oversight is far more stringent than it was during the Celtic Tiger period. This added scrutiny is intended to prevent a recurrence of the reckless lending practices of that era.
• Transparency: Avant Money is required to provide clear and transparent information about the terms and conditions of the mortgage, including potential risks associated with variable interest rates. This contrasts sharply with some of the opaque lending practices of the past.

Assessing the Risks and Rewards of the Flex Mortgage

The Flex Mortgage, while offering flexibility, also presents several inherent risks:

• Interest rate volatility: Variable interest rates can significantly increase monthly payments if interest rates rise, potentially leading to financial hardship for borrowers.
• Potential for over-borrowing: The increased borrowing capacity could tempt borrowers to take on more debt than they can comfortably manage.
• Long-term repayment implications: The flexibility to underpay can extend the repayment period, leading to higher overall interest payments.

However, the rewards are also significant:

• Financial flexibility: The ability to adjust payments based on income fluctuations can provide a much-needed safety net for borrowers.
• Potential for lower overall costs: The ability to overpay can reduce the overall cost and duration of the mortgage.
• Improved affordability: This mortgage may provide access to homeownership for those who would otherwise struggle to meet traditional mortgage criteria.

Conclusion: A Cautious Optimism

Avant Money's Flex Mortgage is a significant development in the Irish mortgage market, offering increased flexibility for borrowers. While the comparison to the Celtic Tiger era is understandable, the current regulatory landscape and stricter lending criteria differ significantly from those of the past. The risks associated with variable interest rates and potential over-borrowing need careful consideration by prospective borrowers. Ultimately, whether the Flex Mortgage represents a return to reckless lending or a genuine innovation depends on responsible borrowing behavior and continued vigilance from regulatory bodies. The future will tell if this approach fosters sustainable growth in the Irish housing market or paves the way for another potential crisis. It necessitates careful assessment by potential borrowers and close monitoring by regulators to ensure the lessons of the past are not forgotten.