**

University Grants Commission (UGC) Takes Strong Stance Against Online Ragging

The University Grants Commission (UGC), the apex regulatory body for higher education in India, has issued a landmark notification classifying harassment of junior students through informal WhatsApp groups as a form of ragging. This decisive move aims to curb the insidious practice of online ragging, which has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. The notification explicitly states that any form of harassment, intimidation, or humiliation inflicted upon junior students via digital platforms, including WhatsApp, Facebook groups, Instagram, and other social media, will be considered a serious offense under the ambit of anti-ragging regulations. This significant development addresses a critical gap in existing anti-ragging laws and provides a much-needed legal framework to tackle the growing menace of cyber-ragging.

What Constitutes Online Ragging Under the New UGC Guidelines?

The UGC guidelines offer a comprehensive definition of online ragging, encompassing a wide range of behaviors. These include:

• Cyberbullying: Sending abusive, threatening, or humiliating messages.
• Online Humiliation: Sharing embarrassing photos or videos without consent.
• Exclusion and Isolation: Deliberately excluding junior students from group chats or online forums.
• Morally objectionable content: Sharing explicit or offensive content targeting juniors.
• Impersonation: Creating fake profiles to harass or defame junior students.
• Spread of rumors and false information: Circulating false or damaging information about junior students.
• Digital blackmail: Threatening to expose private information or compromising content.
• Creating fake accounts for harassment: Setting up false profiles to target victims.

The UGC emphasizes that even seemingly harmless jokes or pranks, if intended to humiliate or distress, fall under the definition of online ragging. The intent behind the act, rather than the severity of the act itself, is a crucial determining factor in deciding whether a case constitutes online ragging.

Strict Penalties for Perpetrators of Online Ragging

The UGC's strong stance is backed by stringent penalties for those found guilty of online ragging. Institutions are mandated to take swift and decisive action, including:

• Suspension or expulsion: Students found guilty of ragging face immediate suspension or expulsion from the institution.
• Police complaints: Serious cases may lead to filing of FIRs (First Information Reports) with the police.
• Disciplinary action: Colleges are directed to implement robust internal disciplinary processes.
• Counseling and rehabilitation: Offenders may be required to undergo mandatory counseling and rehabilitation programs.

This comprehensive approach aims not only to punish offenders but also to prevent future incidents and foster a safer campus environment. The UGC has stressed the importance of creating a culture of respect and empathy on campuses, actively promoting awareness and encouraging students to report any instances of harassment.

Reporting Mechanisms and Institutional Responsibility:

The UGC guidelines underscore the critical role of educational institutions in preventing and addressing online ragging. Institutions are obligated to:

• Establish robust reporting mechanisms: Institutions must provide clear and accessible channels for students to report incidents of online ragging confidentially.
• Conduct awareness campaigns: Regular awareness campaigns are essential to educate students about the dangers of online ragging and the available reporting mechanisms.
• Implement effective anti-ragging committees: Actively functioning anti-ragging committees are vital for investigating complaints and taking appropriate action.
• Monitor online activity: While respecting student privacy, institutions are encouraged to monitor online platforms for signs of harassment.
• Provide training and resources: Staff members should receive training on identifying and addressing online ragging.

The Impact of the UGC's Notification:

The UGC's notification is a significant step towards creating a more inclusive and safe learning environment for all students. By explicitly addressing the issue of online ragging, the commission is sending a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated. The new guidelines not only offer legal clarity but also provide a framework for institutions to take proactive measures to prevent and address online harassment. This move is expected to significantly impact the prevalence of cyber-ragging across Indian universities and colleges.

Keywords: UGC, ragging, anti-ragging, online ragging, cyberbullying, WhatsApp ragging, Facebook ragging, Instagram ragging, social media ragging, higher education, college ragging, university ragging, India, anti-ragging laws, student harassment, digital harassment, cyber harassment, online safety, campus safety, student welfare, reporting mechanism, disciplinary action, suspension, expulsion, police complaint, FIR, counseling, rehabilitation.

Conclusion:

The UGC's decision to classify WhatsApp group harassment as ragging marks a crucial turning point in the fight against online harassment in higher education. This proactive measure demonstrates a commitment to fostering a safe and respectful learning environment free from intimidation and abuse. The effectiveness of these guidelines will ultimately depend on the diligent implementation by universities and colleges and the collective effort of students, faculty, and administration in upholding a culture of respect and responsibility. The strong penalties and clear reporting mechanisms are crucial steps towards ensuring that perpetrators are held accountable and that victims feel empowered to seek justice and support.